Toyota Innova 2.0 G AT (2016) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Innova 2.0 G AT (2016) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Innova 2.0 G AT (2016) Toyota ₱1,309,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) Ford ₱1,399,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 136 PS @ 5600 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 183 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4735 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1830 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1795 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2750 | 2726 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Blue Panther, Crystal Pearl White, Oasis Green, Panther Black, Star White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1611 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link w/ Coil Springs | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 205/65 R16 | 235/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 205/65 R16 | 235/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Innova 2.0 G AT (2016) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance and everyday practicality, the Toyota Innova 2.0 G AT (2016) and the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) present distinct trade‑offs. The Innova is priced at ₱1,309,000, about ₱90,000 cheaper than the ₱1,399,000 Territory. It offers a larger 1998 cc naturally‑aspirated engine delivering 136 PS and 183 Nm, paired with a 6‑speed automatic and rear‑wheel drive, which many families appreciate for its proven reliability and straightforward mechanics. Its seating capacity is not specified, but the model is a traditional MPV, typically accommodating more passengers than the Territory’s 2+3 layout. The Territory, on the other hand, brings a modern 1498 cc turbocharged hybrid powertrain that produces 150 PS and 230 Nm, giving it a clear edge in power and torque while promising better fuel efficiency inherent to hybrid systems, even though exact economy figures are missing. Its front‑wheel‑drive unibody crossover design offers a more car‑like ride and a contemporary look with multiple exterior colour options. If you need a budget‑friendly, larger‑seating MPV for family trips and prefer a conventional gasoline setup, the Innova is the safer pick. If you value higher power, hybrid efficiency, a sleek crossover stance and are willing to pay a premium, the Ford Territory Hybrid is the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Innova 2.0 G AT (2016) costs ₱1,309,000, which is about ₱90,000 less than the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) priced at ₱1,399,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Ford Territory Hybrid Trend produces 150 PS and 230 Nm, surpassing the Innova’s 136 PS and 183 Nm.
What are the drivetrain differences?
The Innova uses rear‑wheel drive (RWD) with a 6‑speed automatic, while the Territory is front‑wheel drive (FWD) with an automatic hybrid transmission.
Which vehicle is more practical for a larger family?
The Innova, being an MPV, typically offers greater passenger capacity than the Territory’s 2+3 seating arrangement, making it more suitable for larger families.