Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (2016) Toyota ₱4,650,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4461cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5170 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | 110 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing raw power and highway performance, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is the superior choice despite a marginal price increase of ₱156,000. It offers significantly more power at 281 PS compared to the LC200's 232 PS and delivers that torque across a wider range (1700-3600 rpm) versus the LC200's narrow 1800-2200 rpm window. However, if budget and fuel economy are the primary concerns, the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT remains the more economical option at ₱4,650,000. The LC200's 4.5L V8 diesel engine produces less peak power but offers a traditional diesel torque curve, while the Prado's 2.4L turbocharged inline-4 is more modern and efficient. The Prado also provides a more spacious interior with 2+3+2 seating versus the LC200's 2+3+3 layout, making the Prado ideal for families needing rear legroom over total passenger count.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT is cheaper at ₱4,650,000 compared to the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT which costs ₱4,806,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is more powerful with 281 PS, whereas the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT produces 232 PS.
Which one has better torque delivery?
The 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT delivers peak torque of 615 Nm starting at 1800 rpm, while the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT offers lower peak torque of 430 Nm but starts at 1700 rpm.
Which vehicle seats more people?
The 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT seats 8 people (2+3+3), while the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT seats 7 people (2+3+2).