Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (White Pearl) (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (White Pearl) (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (White Pearl) (2016) Toyota ₱4,665,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4461cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5170 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | 110 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium (White Pearl) (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing raw power and towing capability, the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium is the superior choice despite its higher price tag. It delivers significantly more performance with 232 PS and a massive 615 Nm of torque compared to the Prado, and offers more seating capacity with a 2+3+3 layout versus the Prado's 2+3+2. However, the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is the logical pick for those who prefer modern technology, a gasoline engine, and a newer model year. The Prado costs ₱141,000 more but brings a 2025 model year, 8-speed automatic transmission, and a 281 PS output, making it better for daily commuting where fuel economy often matters more than brute force. Ultimately, choose the LC200 for off-road capability and seating, or the Prado for a modern, efficient daily driver.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is more powerful, producing 281 PS, whereas the 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium generates 232 PS.
Which model has a higher price?
The 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium is more expensive at ₱4,665,000 compared to the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT which costs ₱4,806,000.
Which vehicle can seat more people?
The 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium can seat more passengers with a 2+3+3 configuration, while the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is limited to a 2+3+2 layout.
Which engine uses diesel fuel?
The 2016 Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT Premium runs on diesel fuel, whereas the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT uses gasoline.