Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active 4×2 AT (2016) Toyota ₱1,420,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,378,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 6000 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | MPV AUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4605 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1275 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | — |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | — |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Steering Ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active 4×2 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a practical crossover with decent power and features, the Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active 4×2 AT is the better choice. It offers more power, a longer warranty, and better fuel efficiency. The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross, while cheaper, lacks in power and has fewer exterior color options.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Rav-4 is cheaper at ₱1,420,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross at ₱1,378,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Rav-4 has more power with 180 PS @ 6000 rpm, while the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross has only 105 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Rav-4 is better suited for daily commuting due to its higher power output and longer warranty period of 3 years/100,000 km compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross's shorter warranty of 1 year/100,000 km.
Which vehicle has more exterior color options?
The Toyota Rav-4 offers fewer exterior color options (only black roof) while the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross provides three different colors: Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof, Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof.