Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) Toyota ₱2,134,000 | BYD Tang DM-i (2026) BYD ₱2,148,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6 years or 150,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | PHEV |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 6000 rpm | 271 PS |
| Max Torque | 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 315 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4605 | 4870 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 1950 |
| Height (mm) | 1715 | 1720 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2820 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 53 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Moonstone Grey, Pearl White, and Silver Sand Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2130 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Ventilated Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Solid Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Steering Ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Premium 4×4 AT (2016) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most practical and powerful option, the 2016 Toyota Rav‑4 Premium 4×4 AT is preferable. It offers a higher maximum power of 180 PS and torque of 233 Nm, an all‑wheel drive system for better traction, and a longer warranty period of 100 000 km/3‑years. Although its price is slightly lower at ₱2,134,000 compared to the BYD Tang DM‑i’s ₱2,148,000, the Rav‑4’s larger displacement (2494 cc vs. 1498 cc) and naturally aspirated engine provide a more traditional driving experience suitable for varied road conditions. The BYD Tang DM‑i, priced only ₱14,000 higher, is a plug‑in hybrid with a turbocharged 1498 cc engine and a 6‑speed automatic transmission, but it is front‑wheel drive and offers a more complex powertrain. If the buyer prioritizes electric‑hybrid efficiency, larger seating capacity (2+3+2), and a 6‑year/150 000 km warranty, the Tang DM‑i is the better choice. Otherwise, for everyday practicality and a stronger engine, choose the Toyota Rav‑4.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Rav‑4 Premium 4×4 AT costs ₱2,134,000, while the BYD Tang DM‑i is priced at ₱2,148,000.
Which has more power?
The Toyota Rav‑4 delivers 180 PS, whereas the BYD Tang DM‑i produces 271 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The BYD Tang DM‑i, being a plug‑in hybrid with 6‑year/150 000 km warranty and PHEV fuel type, may offer better efficiency for daily commuting.
Which has more seats?
The BYD Tang DM‑i accommodates 2+3+2 passengers, while the Toyota Rav‑4 seats 2+3.