Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025) Toyota ₱818,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1329cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm | 139 PS |
| Max Torque | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | CVT | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Segment | B | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4410 | 4965 |
| Width (mm) | 1700 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1475 | 2180 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2550 | 2750 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 42 | 55 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1775 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo Gas M/T SWB (2025): which should you buy?
The Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers prioritizing value and reliability. At ₱841,000, it is cheaper than the Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 (₱818,000) and offers 99 PS of power versus 139 PS, making it more fuel-efficient for daily commutes. Its FWD design and 4-door sedan body suit urban and suburban use, while the Tamaraw’s RWD configuration and 2-door van body are suited for light cargo tasks. The Vios’ 100,000km/3-year warranty aligns with the Tamaraw’s 3-year or 100,000km coverage, but the Vios’ lower price and 2+3 seating make it ideal for families and commuters. The Tamaraw’s higher power and 1998cc engine are unnecessary for typical Filipino driving, while the Vios’ simplicity and durability justify the purchase for most buyers. Overall, the Vios offers superior practicality and cost-effectiveness for the segment.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 costs ₱818,000, while the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT is ₱841,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 delivers 139 PS, compared to 99 PS for the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT is more practical for daily commuting due to its 2+3 seating, FWD drive, and 99 PS engine, unlike the Toyota Tamaraw 2.0’s 2-seat van design and 139 PS output.
What drivetrain does each vehicle use?
The Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT uses FWD, while the Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 uses RWD.