Volvo XC60 T5 (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Volvo XC60 T5 (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Volvo XC60 T5 (2016) Volvo ₱3,695,000 | Mini Aceman SE (2025) Mini ₱3,550,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 2 Years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Insurance | Upon Request | — |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1969cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 245 HP @ 5500 rpm | 215 PS |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 330 Nm |
| Transmission | 8-Speed Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.2s | — |
| Top Speed | 210 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 14.92 | — |
| Euro NCAP Rating | 5 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover/SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Hatchback |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4644 | 4079 |
| Width (mm) | 1891 | 1754 |
| Height (mm) | 1713 | 1514 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2774 | 2606 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1833 | 1710 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 70 | — |
| Front Headroom (mm) | 1025 | — |
| Rear Headroom (mm) | 1003 | — |
| Front Legroom (mm) | 1047 | — |
| Rear Legroom (mm) | 924 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Orange |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut, Coil Spring, Hydraulic Shock Absorbers, Stabilizer Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multilink, Independent Suspensionwith Coil Springs, Hydraulic Shock Absorber, Stabilizer Bar | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 19 |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Tires | — | 255/45R19 |
| Rear Tires | — | 255/45R19 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | Yes | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | Yes | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Remote Central Locki | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Electronic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electric Par | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Volvo XC60 T5 (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and spacious crossover SUV with good fuel efficiency, the Volvo XC60 T5 is the better choice. It offers more power, better insurance options, and a longer warranty than the Mini Aceman SE. The XC60's Euro NCAP rating of 5 also indicates its safety features.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better insurance coverage?
The Volvo XC60 T5 does not have insurance information provided, but it is generally more expensive to insure compared to the Mini Aceman SE.
What is the difference in power between the two vehicles?
The Volvo XC60 T5 has 245 HP while the Mini Aceman SE has a max power of only 215 PS. The XC60 offers more power, which can be beneficial for quicker acceleration and performance.
Which vehicle is better suited for daily commuting?
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive (FWD), but the Volvo XC60 T5 with its longer warranty and Euro NCAP rating of 5 might offer a safer driving experience. However, the Mini Aceman SE's electric motor could potentially provide smoother acceleration and quieter ride.
Which vehicle is more fuel efficient?
The Volvo XC60 T5 has a combined fuel economy of 14.92 km/L while the Mini Aceman SE does not have any information on its fuel consumption, but it uses electricity as its primary source of power which can be more economical in the long run.