Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026) MG ₱1,398,888 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | PHEV |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 95 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 130 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic DHT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1825 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1800 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2800 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 60 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Pearl White, Andes Gray, and Pearl Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1800 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Synthetic Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs MG G50 PHEV 1.5L (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a work‑horse that can haul cargo or tackle rough roads, the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT is the clear choice. It costs ₱1,328,000, about ₱70,000 less than the MG G50 PHEV, and delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque – far more power and low‑end grunt than the MG’s 95 PS and 130 Nm. Its 6‑speed manual, rear‑wheel drive layout and body‑on‑frame pickup construction give it the durability and payload capacity expected of a utility vehicle, with a 2+3 seating layout and a long 5277 mm wheelbase for cargo space. The Ranger also comes with a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, suitable for commercial use. The MG G50 PHEV, priced at ₱1,398,888, targets families seeking a modern MPV with hybrid efficiency, five doors, and a 2+3+2 seat arrangement. Its front‑wheel‑drive, unibody van design offers better ride comfort for city commuting but only 95 PS and 130 Nm, making it less capable for heavy loads or steep climbs. Its 5‑year/100,000 km warranty is longer, but the higher price and lower performance limit its appeal to those prioritising fuel‑saving tech over utility. Choose the Ranger if you need power, cargo capacity and lower price; choose the MG G50 if you prefer a family‑friendly hybrid with a longer warranty for urban use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT is priced at ₱1,328,000, which is about ₱70,000 less than the MG G50 PHEV’s price of ₱1,398,888.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Ranger delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, whereas the MG G50 PHEV produces only 95 PS and 130 Nm.
Which vehicle is better suited for cargo or work use?
The Ranger’s pickup body, rear‑wheel drive, higher torque and larger dimensions make it far more suitable for hauling cargo or work tasks than the MG’s MPV van design.
Is the MG G50 PHEV more suitable for daily commuting?
Yes, its five‑door MPV layout, front‑wheel drive, hybrid powertrain and longer 5‑year warranty cater to family‑oriented city commuting, though it offers less power than the Ranger.