Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1260 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) and the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on intended use. The Ranger, priced at ₱1,328,000, is a rugged pickup with a turbo‑charged 2.2‑litre diesel delivering 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, far out‑powering the Xpander’s 105 PS gasoline engine. Its 6‑speed manual, rear‑wheel drive layout and higher ground clearance make it suitable for hauling cargo, off‑road trips, or work‑site duties, while still seating up to five. Conversely, the Xpander, at ₱1,259,000, is a modern MPV with a 1.5‑litre naturally aspirated gasoline engine, automatic transmission, and front‑wheel drive, offering smoother city driving, better fuel economy and a more family‑friendly cabin with three rows (2+3+2). Its unibody construction, five doors and multiple exterior color options add to everyday practicality and comfort. If you need a workhorse that can tow and handle rough terrain, the Ranger is the clear pick despite the higher price and manual gearbox. If your priority is daily commuting, family transport, and ease of use in urban traffic, the Xpander provides sufficient power, lower price and automatic convenience.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT costs ₱1,259,000, which is ₱69,000 less than the Ford Ranger Wildtrak priced at ₱1,328,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak’s 2.2 L turbo diesel produces 160 PS and 385 Nm, significantly more than the Xpander’s 105 PS and 141 Nm.
Is the Ranger or Xpander better for city commuting?
The Xpander is better suited for city commuting with its automatic 4‑speed transmission, front‑wheel drive, smaller gasoline engine and MPV layout offering easier maneuverability and comfort.
Which vehicle is more practical for hauling cargo?
The Ranger, being a pickup with a 4‑door cab, rear‑wheel drive and higher torque, is more practical for hauling cargo and towing compared to the Xpander’s passenger‑focused MPV design.