Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) Mitsubishi ₱1,215,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Crossover |
| Segment | Pick-Up | J |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4295 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1770 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1625 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2670 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 63 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1350 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 215/60 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 215/60 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Electronic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt and telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017): which should you buy?
Between the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4x2 MT and the Mitsubishi ASX GLS, your choice hinges on lifestyle and priorities. The Ranger is a body-on-frame pickup with diesel power (160 PS, 385 Nm) and a manual transmission, ideal for heavy-duty work, towing, or off-road use. Its high torque at low RPMs suits hauling cargo or navigating rough terrain. However, it is discontinued, so only used units are available. The ASX is a unibody crossover with a gasoline engine (150 PS, 197 Nm) and CVT, offering a smoother, more comfortable ride for daily commuting and city driving. It is still in production, so you can buy new with warranty. The Ranger is slightly more expensive at ₱1,219,000 vs. ₱1,215,000, but the ASX provides better fuel efficiency for urban use and easier parking. For a family needing a practical daily driver with modern amenities, the ASX is the better choice. For a buyer who needs a rugged workhorse or off-road capability, the used Ranger is worth considering, but factor in higher fuel and maintenance costs. Ultimately, the ASX wins for most Filipino buyers due to its ongoing availability, comfort, and lower running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi ASX GLS is slightly cheaper at ₱1,215,000 compared to the Ford Ranger XLT at ₱1,219,000, a difference of ₱4,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has higher torque (385 Nm) and power (160 PS) than the ASX (197 Nm, 150 PS), making it better for heavy loads and towing.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi ASX is better for daily commuting due to its unibody construction, CVT transmission, and gasoline engine, offering a smoother and more fuel-efficient ride in city traffic.
Which is more practical for cargo?
The Ford Ranger, as a pickup truck with a bed and body-on-frame construction, is more practical for carrying heavy or bulky cargo, while the ASX has a smaller enclosed cargo area.