Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1260 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4x2 MT (2017) and the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) hinges on your primary need: rugged utility versus modern family practicality. The Ranger, at ₱1,219,000, offers a powerful 160 PS turbo-diesel engine with 385 Nm of torque, a 6-speed manual transmission, and a body-on-frame construction ideal for heavy loads, off-road driving, and towing. However, it is discontinued, so you'd be buying used, and its 2017 model year means older tech and safety features. In contrast, the Xpander GLS AT (₱1,259,000) is a current model with a 7-seat MPV layout, unibody construction for better on-road comfort, and a fuel-efficient 1.5L gasoline engine (105 PS, 141 Nm) paired with a 4-speed automatic. It's better for daily commuting, city driving, and carrying passengers. The Ranger is for those who need a workhorse or off-road capability; the Xpander is for families prioritizing space, comfort, and modern features. The price difference is only ₱40,000, but the Xpander offers newer tech and warranty support. Ultimately, choose the Ranger if you need a tough pickup for hauling and rough terrain; choose the Xpander for a versatile, comfortable family vehicle.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4x2 MT (2017) is cheaper at ₱1,219,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) at ₱1,259,000, a difference of ₱40,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger is significantly more powerful with 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, while the Xpander has 105 PS and 141 Nm. The Ranger's turbo-diesel engine provides much higher torque for hauling and off-road use.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, unibody construction for a smoother ride, and gasoline engine that is quieter and more refined in city traffic. The Ranger's manual transmission and body-on-frame design are less comfortable for urban driving.
Which has more seats?
The Mitsubishi Xpander seats 7 passengers (2+3+2 layout), while the Ford Ranger seats only 5 (2+3). The Xpander is better for families needing to carry more people.