Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) Mazda ₱1,395,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) Ford ₱1,399,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Crossover |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2055 | 1611 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Blue Panther, Crystal Pearl White, Oasis Green, Panther Black, Star White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality versus modernity, the Mazda BT‑50 2.2 4×2 AT (2017) emerges as the more versatile option, especially for those who need a reliable workhorse or family pickup. Priced at ₱1,395,000, it offers a robust turbo‑diesel inline‑4 engine that delivers 150 PS and an impressive 375 Nm torque, ideal for towing or heavy-duty tasks. Its body‑on‑frame construction, rear‑wheel drive, and 2+3 seating make it suitable for both cargo and passenger use. The Ford Territory Hybrid Trend, while slightly higher at ₱1,399,000 and featuring a hybrid powertrain with 150 PS and 230 Nm torque, is geared more toward urban commuters who prioritize fuel efficiency and a smoother driving experience. Its front‑wheel drive, unibody design, and five‑door midsize crossover layout cater to families needing more interior space and a modern aesthetic. Ultimately, if you need a vehicle that can handle rougher roads or heavier loads, the Mazda BT‑50 is the better choice; if your focus is city driving with lower emissions and a contemporary look, the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend offers those advantages. Both share similar warranties (3 years/100,000 km) and are available now, but the decision hinges on your primary use case: work versus daily commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda BT‑50 is priced at ₱1,395,000 while the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend costs ₱1,399,000, making the Mazda slightly cheaper.
Which vehicle has more torque?
The Mazda BT‑50 provides 375 Nm of torque, whereas the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend offers 230 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for heavy-duty work?
The Mazda BT‑50’s body‑on‑frame construction, rear‑wheel drive, and higher torque make it more suitable for towing or heavy cargo.
Which vehicle is better for city commuting?
The Ford Territory Hybrid Trend’s hybrid powertrain, front‑wheel drive, and unibody design provide a smoother ride and better fuel efficiency for urban use.