Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) Mazda ₱1,350,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,378,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2052 | 1275 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | — |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | — |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a reliable and practical vehicle with good towing capacity, the Mazda BT-50 might be more suitable. Despite its higher price point, it offers better power and torque for towing heavy loads, which is crucial in daily commuting scenarios.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has a longer towing capacity?
The Mazda BT-50 has a 4×2 configuration, allowing it to tow heavier loads compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross's FWD setup.
How much more powerful is the Mazda BT-50 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross?
The Mazda BT-50 delivers 150 PS of power at 3700 rpm, while the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross produces only 105 PS. This significant difference in power can be crucial for towing and performance.
Which car offers better fuel efficiency?
Unfortunately, the Mazda BT-50 and Mitsubishi Xpander Cross do not provide specific fuel consumption figures. However, diesel engines generally offer better fuel efficiency than gasoline ones, suggesting the BT-50 might have an edge in this area.
Which car is more spacious for passengers and cargo?
The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross offers a seating capacity of 2+3+2, which can be advantageous if you need extra space for passengers or cargo. The Mazda BT-50's seating configuration is simpler at 2+3.