Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) Mazda ₱1,350,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2052 | 1260 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for practicality and affordability with good power-to-weight ratio, the Mazda BT-50 is recommended. It offers better towing capabilities and fuel efficiency for its segment. The Mitsubishi Xpander is more versatile but lacks in terms of towing capacity and power.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Mazda BT-50 and Mitsubishi Xpander?
The Mazda BT-50 starts at ₱1,350,000 while the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT costs ₱1,259,000. The Xpander is slightly cheaper by ₱91,000.
Which vehicle offers better towing capacity?
The Mazda BT-50 has a higher towing capacity of 3,500 kg compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander's 1,800 kg. The BT-50 is more suitable for towing heavy loads.
Which vehicle is better suited for daily commuting?
The Mazda BT-50 offers better fuel efficiency and a smoother ride due to its RWD setup, making it ideal for daily driving. The Xpander's FWD design might be less comfortable for long commutes.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT produces 105 PS of max power compared to the Mazda BT-50's 150 PS, making it slightly weaker in terms of raw power but still adequate for daily use.