Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) Mazda ₱1,350,000 | Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020) Toyota ₱1,396,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2982cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 136 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 300 Nm @ 1200 - 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 16.0 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1980 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2570 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2052 | 2475 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 70 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 195/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Dual Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4×2 MT (2017) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with good power-to-price ratio, the Mazda BT-50 is recommended over the Toyota Hiace Commuter. The Mazda offers more torque at lower RPMs which can be beneficial in urban driving conditions. The BT-50 also comes with a longer warranty period of 3 years/100,000 km compared to the Hiace's 3-years/100,000 km. For those who prioritize power and daily commuting needs, the Toyota Hiace Commuter is more suitable due to its higher displacement engine and better torque output at lower RPMs.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Mazda BT-50 and Toyota Hiace Commuter?
The Mazda BT-50 costs ₱1,350,000 while the Toyota Hiace Commuter costs ₱1,396,000. The Mazda is slightly cheaper by ₱46,000.
Which vehicle offers better power output?
The Toyota Hiace Commuter has a higher maximum torque of 300 Nm compared to the Mazda BT-50's 375 Nm at lower RPMs. The Hiace also produces more horsepower with 136 PS compared to the BT-50's 150 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Hiace Commuter, despite being slightly more expensive, offers better power and torque output which can be advantageous in urban driving conditions. The Mazda BT-50 has a longer warranty period but its lower RPM torque might not be as beneficial for frequent city driving.
Which vehicle is easier to maintain based on the available information?
The Mazda BT-50 comes with a 3-year/100,000 km warranty while the Toyota Hiace Commuter has a similar warranty period. However, Mazda's body-on-frame construction might be more durable and less prone to rust compared to the Hiace's BODF construction which can affect maintenance costs.