Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) Mazda ₱1,550,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) Ford ₱1,599,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4x4 | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Crossover |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2218 | 1611 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Crystal Pearl White, Star White, Oasis Green, Blue Panther, Panther Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid, Leaf Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 235/50R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 235/50R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Dual Zone Temperature Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4×4 AT (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a work‑horse that can haul cargo, tow heavy loads, or tackle rough provincial roads, the 2017 Mazda BT‑50 3.2 4×4 AT is the clearer choice. It costs ₱1,550,000, slightly cheaper than the 2026 Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X at ₱1,599,000, and delivers 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque – far more than the Territory’s 150 PS and 230 Nm. Its body‑on‑frame construction, 4×4 drivetrain and a 5‑meter‑plus wheelbase give it true off‑road capability and a usable pickup bed, making it ideal for small‑business owners, farmers, or anyone who regularly transports goods. The BT‑50’s diesel engine also offers better low‑end grunt for hauling, though fuel economy isn’t specified. Conversely, the Territory Hybrid is a modern unibody midsize crossover with a hybrid powertrain, FWD, five doors and a more car‑like ride, suited to families or urban commuters who value fuel efficiency, a refined cabin and multiple exterior colour options. Its higher price and lower torque make it less suitable for heavy payloads. In short, choose the Mazda BT‑50 if you need rugged utility and torque; pick the Ford Territory Hybrid if you prefer a comfortable, fuel‑savvy crossover for city driving.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda BT‑50 is priced at ₱1,550,000, which is ₱49,000 less than the Ford Territory Hybrid at ₱1,599,000.
Which one has more power and torque?
The BT‑50 produces 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, while the Territory Hybrid offers 150 PS and 230 Nm.
Is the Mazda BT‑50 suitable for daily commuting?
It can be used for commuting, but its pickup design, 4×4 drivetrain and diesel engine are geared more toward utility and off‑road use than everyday city comfort.
What body style and drivetrain differences exist?
The BT‑50 is a body‑on‑frame pickup with 4×4 and diesel, whereas the Territory Hybrid is a unibody midsize crossover SUV with front‑wheel drive and a hybrid powertrain.