Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) Mazda ₱1,600,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) Ford ₱1,599,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 148 PS @ 6000 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 192 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4275 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1535 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1290 | 1611 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 44 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Crystal Pearl White, Star White, Oasis Green, Blue Panther, Panther Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 215/50 R18 | 235/50R19 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50 R18 | 235/50R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026): which should you buy?
The Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers. At ₱1,600,000, it is cheaper than the ₱1,599,000 Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026). Key advantages include 148 PS of power versus 150 PS but significantly higher torque (192 Nm vs. 230 Nm) and a 6-speed automatic transmission, which offers better drivability. Both models have AWD, 5 doors, and 2+3 seating, but the CX-3’s naturally aspirated engine and longer wheelbase (4275 mm) provide a distinct driving feel. The Ford offers a hybrid powertrain, which may appeal to eco-conscious drivers, but the CX-3’s lower price and balanced performance make it the more accessible option for daily use. For a crossover prioritizing value and simplicity, the CX-3 wins.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) costs ₱1,600,000, while the Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) is ₱1,599,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) produces 150 PS, higher than the Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017)’s 148 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-3 2.0 Activ AWD (2017) has a 6-speed automatic transmission and 192 Nm of torque, which may offer smoother daily driving compared to the Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026)’s 230 Nm but 150 PS.
Does the Ford have a hybrid engine?
Yes, the Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) uses a hybrid powertrain.