Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) Mazda ₱1,510,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) Ford ₱1,599,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 148 PS @ 6000 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 192 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4275 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1535 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1223 | 1611 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 44 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Crystal Pearl White, Star White, Oasis Green, Blue Panther, Panther Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam Axle | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 215/50 R18 | 235/50R19 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50 R18 | 235/50R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026): which should you buy?
The Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) is the better overall choice for most Filipino buyers despite its higher price of ₱1,599,000 compared to the Mazda CX-3's ₱1,510,000. The Territory offers a more modern hybrid powertrain (1.5L turbo hybrid vs CX-3's 2.0L NA) with equal power (150 PS vs 148 PS) but significantly more torque (230 Nm vs 192 Nm), resulting in livelier everyday driving. Its midsize crossover body likely provides more interior space and comfort, though specific dimensions are not provided. The 2026 model year also means newer technology and design. The CX-3, being a 2017 model, is outdated and less efficient. For buyers prioritizing lower upfront cost and a more compact footprint, the CX-3 remains a solid, reliable choice with its proven 2.0L engine and 6-speed automatic. However, the Territory's hybrid efficiency, greater torque, and modern features justify the ₱89k premium, making it the recommended vehicle for those seeking a fuel-efficient, powerful, and contemporary crossover for daily commuting and family use.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Mazda CX-3 and Ford Territory?
The Mazda CX-3 2.0 Sport FWD (2017) is cheaper at ₱1,510,000, while the Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) is ₱89,000 more expensive at ₱1,599,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
Both have similar power (CX-3: 148 PS, Territory: 150 PS). However, the Ford Territory produces significantly more torque (230 Nm vs 192 Nm), giving it better acceleration and pulling power.
Which is better for fuel economy?
The Ford Territory is a hybrid, so it will likely offer better fuel economy, especially in city driving. The Mazda CX-3 is a conventional gasoline engine with no hybrid system.
Which is newer and more modern?
The Ford Territory is a 2026 model, making it much newer than the Mazda CX-3 which is a 2017 model. The Territory benefits from newer technology, design, and a hybrid powertrain.