Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) Mazda ₱1,650,000 | GAC Aion V Premium (2026) GAC ₱1,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 8-year / 160,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1998cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Natural aspirated | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm | 224 PS |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed AT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4550 | 4605 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 1854 |
| Height (mm) | 1675 | 1686 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1514 | 2330 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 56 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Sahara Sand, Onyx Black, Alpine White, Volcano Orange, Aurora Silver, Iceland Grey, Volcano Orange with White Roof |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | PVC |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality between the 2017 Mazda CX‑5 2.0 FWD PRO and the 2026 GAC Aion V Premium, the Mazda offers a clear advantage in price and proven performance. At ₱1,650,000 it is ₱48,000 cheaper than the GAC, making it more budget‑friendly for families or individuals who need a reliable vehicle without a large upfront investment. The Mazda’s 155 PS (≈152 kW) inline‑4 engine delivers a respectable 200 Nm torque, while the GAC’s electric motor supplies 224 PS and 240 Nm—higher figures that translate to better acceleration, especially at low speeds. However, the electric powertrain of the GAC comes with a generous 8‑year/160,000 km warranty and zero fuel costs, which can offset the higher purchase price over time for commuters who drive long distances daily. In terms of practicality, both models seat five and share a unibody construction, but the GAC’s slightly longer length (4605 mm vs 4550 mm) and wider width (1854 mm) give it a marginally larger interior footprint. If your priority is immediate affordability and proven mechanical reliability, choose the Mazda CX‑5. If you’re willing to invest more upfront for higher power, a longer warranty, and the future‑proof appeal of an electric vehicle—especially if you have access to charging infrastructure—the GAC Aion V Premium is the better option.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑5 2.0 FWD PRO costs ₱1,650,000, while the GAC Aion V Premium is priced at ₱1,698,000, making the Mazda cheaper by ₱48,000.
Which has more power?
The GAC Aion V Premium’s electric motor produces 224 PS and 240 Nm torque, higher than the Mazda’s 155 PS and 200 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda offers lower upfront cost and proven mechanical reliability, while the GAC’s electric motor provides higher torque for quick acceleration and zero fuel cost, potentially saving money on long daily commutes.
What warranty differences exist?
The Mazda offers a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty, whereas the GAC provides an 8‑year or 160,000 km warranty—longer coverage for the electric model.