Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) Nissan ₱1,836,000 | GAC Aion V Premium (2026) GAC ₱1,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 8-year / 160,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2488cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 15:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS | — |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 224 PS |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Fuel Type | — | Electric |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 15 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5230 | 4605 |
| Width (mm) | 1880 | 1854 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1686 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Sahara Sand, Onyx Black, Alpine White, Volcano Orange, Aurora Silver, Iceland Grey, Volcano Orange with White Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2330 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 steel | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 steel | 19 |
| Front Tires | 195/70/R15 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 195/70/R15 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing upfront cost savings and modern electric mobility, the GAC Aion V Premium is the clear choice at ₱1,698,000, compared to the Nissan Urvan Premium's ₱1,836,000. The Aion V offers superior long-term value with an 8-year/160,000km warranty versus the Nissan's 3-year/100,000km, and it is currently available while the Nissan is discontinued. However, the Nissan Urvan Premium delivers significantly more raw power with 129 PS versus the Aion V's 224 PS (note: the data lists the Aion V's torque as 240 Nm while the Nissan's torque is 356 Nm, indicating the Nissan has higher torque output), and it seats 15 passengers compared to the Aion V's 2+3 configuration. The Nissan also features a body-on-frame construction for durability, whereas the Aion V uses a unibody design. If you need a large 15-passenger van with higher torque and do not mind a higher price and discontinued status, choose the Nissan. If you prioritize lower entry price, a longer warranty, and a modern crossover look with 5 doors, choose the GAC Aion V.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle costs less?
The GAC Aion V Premium is cheaper at ₱1,698,000 compared to the Nissan Urvan Premium's ₱1,836,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The GAC Aion V Premium has higher peak power at 224 PS compared to the Nissan Urvan Premium's 129 PS, though the Nissan delivers higher torque at 356 Nm versus the Aion V's 240 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in traffic?
The GAC Aion V Premium is more practical for daily commuting as it is currently available and features a 5-door unibody crossover design, whereas the Nissan Urvan Premium is discontinued and has a 4-door body-on-frame van design.
Which vehicle offers better warranty coverage?
The GAC Aion V Premium offers superior coverage with an 8-year/160,000km warranty, while the Nissan Urvan Premium only offers a 3-year/100,000km warranty.