Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS 6 A/T (2018) vs Suzuki Dzire GL (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS 6 A/T (2018) vs Suzuki Dzire GL (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS 6 A/T (2018) Hyundai Suzuki Dzire GL (2018) Suzuki
Overview
Model Year 2018 2018
Availability — Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated, NU MPI Atkinson Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Gas Gas
Max Power 149 PS @ 6200 rpm 82 PS @ 6000 rpm
Max Torque 179 nm @ 4500 rpm 113 nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6-A/T 5-M/T
Drivetrain FWD FWD
Displacement — 1197cc
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Crossover Sedan
Segment J F
Construction Unibody Unibody
Doors 4 4
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+3
Length (mm) 4165 3995
Width (mm) 1800 1735
Height (mm) 1550 1515
Wheelbase (mm) 2600 2450
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson Strut MacPherson w/ Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Coupled Torsion Beam Axle Torsion Beam with Coil Spring
Front Wheels 17 15" Alloys
Rear Wheels 17 15" Alloys
Front Tires 215/55/R17 185/65/R15
Rear Tires 215/55/R17 185/65/R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Drum
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No No
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No No
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm Yes No
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Manual
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric —
Key Type Keyless Entry Standard Key
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows No No
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna no no
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 2 2
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB No No
AUX Input No No
AM/FM Radio No No
CD Player No No
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback No No
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Fog Lights Yes No
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS 6 A/T (2018) vs Suzuki Dzire GL (2018): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact crossover with decent power and practicality, the Hyundai Kona GLS seems to be the better choice. It offers more torque and slightly higher power output compared to the Suzuki Dzire GL, making it potentially easier to drive in various conditions and providing better acceleration. The Kona also has a longer wheelbase which could translate into better ride quality and handling.

Frequently asked questions

Which car is cheaper between Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS and Suzuki Dzire GL?

The price of the Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS is not provided, but based on its specifications, it might be more expensive compared to the Suzuki Dzire GL which has a current availability status.

Which car has better power output between Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS and Suzuki Dzire GL?

The Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS has higher torque (179 Nm vs 113 Nm) and slightly higher max power (149 PS vs 82 PS), making it potentially easier to drive in various conditions.

Which car is better for daily commuting between Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS and Suzuki Dzire GL?

The Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS with its higher torque output could be more suitable for daily commuting, as it might offer smoother acceleration and better handling on roads.

Which car has a longer wheelbase between Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS and Suzuki Dzire GL?

The Hyundai Kona 2.0 GLS has a longer wheelbase of 2600 mm compared to the Suzuki Dzire GL's 1735 mm, which could provide better ride quality and handling.