Suzuki Vitara GLX (2018) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Vitara GLX (2018) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Vitara GLX (2018) Suzuki ₱1,098,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025) Toyota ₱1,142,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1586cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, VVT | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 115 PS @ 6000 rpm | 150 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 156 Nm @ 4400 rpm | 343 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Manual |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+12 |
| Length (mm) | 4175 | 5303 |
| Width (mm) | 1775 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1610 | 2097 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2500 | 3085 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1120 | 1905 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 47 | 55 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam with Coil spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | 14 |
| Front Tires | 216/55 R17 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 216/55 R17 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Suzuki Vitara GLX (2018) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a compact, city‑friendly vehicle for daily commuting and occasional weekend trips, the 2018 Suzuki Vitara GLX is the more suitable choice. It costs ₱1,098,000, about ₱44,000 less than the 2025 Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van, and its 5‑door crossover body offers easier access for a small family (2+3 seats) compared to the van’s 3‑door layout. The Vitara’s 1.6‑L naturally aspirated engine delivers 115 PS and 156 Nm, sufficient for urban driving, while its front‑wheel‑drive layout and unibody construction provide better fuel economy and ride comfort on paved roads. Its 6‑speed automatic transmission adds convenience in stop‑and‑go traffic. The Tamaraw, priced at ₱1,142,000, targets commercial or large‑group use with a 2.4‑L turbo diesel that produces 150 PS and a hefty 343 Nm, ideal for heavy loads and long‑haul trips, but its 2+12 seating, body‑on‑frame build and manual transmission make it less practical for everyday city use. Choose the Vitara if you prioritize lower price, easier city maneuverability, and passenger comfort; opt for the Tamaraw only if you need high torque for cargo or many passengers and are willing to pay the premium.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Suzuki Vitara GLX is priced at ₱1,098,000, which is ₱44,000 less than the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van priced at ₱1,142,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van has a higher output with 150 PS and 343 Nm, while the Suzuki Vitara GLX produces 115 PS and 156 Nm.
Which is more practical for daily city commuting?
The Vitara’s 5‑door crossover body, front‑wheel‑drive, automatic transmission and smaller dimensions make it more practical for everyday city driving than the Tamaraw’s 3‑door van layout and manual transmission.
What are the seating capacities?
The Vitara seats 2+3 passengers, whereas the Tamaraw can accommodate 2 drivers plus up to 12 passengers.