Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018) Toyota ₱3,839,000 | Mini Aceman SE (2025) Mini ₱3,550,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2982cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3600 rpm | 215 PS |
| Max Torque | 410 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 330 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Hatchback |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4840 | 4079 |
| Width (mm) | 1885 | 1754 |
| Height (mm) | 1890 | 1514 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2790 | 2606 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 87 | — |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Orange |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1710 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone Independent Suspension with Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link Type Suspension with Stabilizer | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R 18 | 255/45R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R 18 | 255/45R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED+Projector | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT (2018) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and everyday practicality, the Mini Aceman SE edges out the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 3.0 Diesel AT in most daily scenarios. Priced at ₱3.55 million, the Aceman is about ₱289,000 cheaper than the Prado’s ₱3.839 million tag, and its electric drivetrain eliminates fuel costs while delivering 215 PS—significantly more power than the Prado’s 163 PS, albeit with lower torque (330 Nm vs 410 Nm). The Aceman’s compact dimensions (4.08 m long, 1.75 m wide) make city parking and maneuvering easier, and its three‑door layout with a 2+2 seating plan suits small families or couples who prioritize cargo space over maximum passenger capacity. Its 3‑year/100,000 km warranty matches the Prado’s, but the electric vehicle offers a cleaner, quieter ride and lower operating expenses, important for urban commuters. The Prado, however, remains the stronger choice for those needing true off‑road capability, a larger 5‑door cabin with 2+3+2 seating, and 4WD traction for rugged trips. Its 5‑speed automatic and higher torque favor heavy loads and steep climbs, but the higher price and larger footprint may be less suited to congested city life. Ultimately, choose the Mini Aceman SE if you want a cheaper, more powerful, eco‑friendly city SUV; opt for the Land Cruiser Prado if you require serious off‑road ability and larger family seating.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mini Aceman SE costs ₱3,550,000, which is about ₱289,000 less than the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado’s price of ₱3,839,000.
Which model has more power?
The Mini Aceman SE produces 215 PS, while the Land Cruiser Prado delivers 163 PS, making the Aceman the more powerful of the two.
Is the Prado better for off‑road use?
Yes, the Prado features a 4WD drivetrain and higher torque (410 Nm) suited for off‑road conditions, whereas the Aceman is front‑wheel drive and designed for urban use.
Which SUV is more practical for city driving?
The Aceman’s smaller size (4,079 mm length, 1,754 mm width), three‑door layout and electric powertrain make it more maneuverable and cheaper to run in city traffic compared to the larger, diesel‑powered Prado.