BYD Tang DM-i (2026) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BYD Tang DM-i (2026) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BYD Tang DM-i (2026) BYD ₱2,148,000 | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,964,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 6 years or 150,000 km | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | PHEV | Diesel |
| Max Power | 271 PS | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 315 Nm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4x4 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Pickup |
| Segment | Crossover | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Moonstone Grey, Pearl White, and Silver Sand Black | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4870 | 5370 |
| Width (mm) | 1950 | 1918 |
| Height (mm) | 1720 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2820 | 3270 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2130 | 2194 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 53 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 255/55R20 | 255/70/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 255/55R20 | 255/70/R16 |
| Front Brakes | Ventilated Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Solid Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
BYD Tang DM-i (2026) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023): which should you buy?
The BYD Tang DM-i and the Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on lifestyle. The Tang is a midsize crossover SUV priced at ₱2,148,000, offering a PHEV powertrain with 271 PS and 315 Nm, front‑wheel drive, and three‑row seating (2+3+2). Its unibody construction, automatic 6‑speed gearbox and hybrid efficiency make it ideal for families or urban commuters who value low‑fuel running costs, extra passenger capacity, and a modern SUV look. In contrast, the Ranger is a body‑on‑frame pickup priced slightly lower at ₱1,964,000. It delivers 170 PS but a higher torque of 405 Nm, 4×4 capability, and a manual 6‑speed transmission, catering to buyers who need off‑road capability, cargo bed utility, and rugged durability. While the Ranger’s diesel engine is more torque‑rich for hauling, it only seats 2+3 and lacks the hybrid’s fuel‑saving advantage. If you prioritize passenger space, hybrid efficiency, and city driving, the BYD Tang DM-i is the better fit. If you need a work‑horse for towing, off‑road trips, and a lower upfront price, the Ford Ranger remains the practical choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport costs ₱1,964,000, which is lower than the BYD Tang DM-i’s price of ₱2,148,000.
Which model has more power?
The BYD Tang DM-i produces 271 PS, surpassing the Ranger’s 170 PS, making the Tang more powerful in terms of peak horsepower.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The BYD Tang DM-i, with its PHEV system, automatic transmission, front‑wheel drive and three‑row seating, offers lower running costs and easier maneuverability for urban use.
Which vehicle is more suitable for off‑road or heavy hauling?
The Ford Ranger’s 4×4 drivetrain, higher torque of 405 Nm, and body‑on‑frame construction make it better suited for off‑road driving and heavy payloads.