Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3L Z71 4×4 A/T (2022) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3L Z71 4×4 A/T (2022) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3L Z71 4×4 A/T (2022) Chevrolet ₱7,703,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2022 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 5-years/100,000km | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 5328cc | — |
| Valvetrain | OHV 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | — |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Max Power | 355 PS @ 5600 rpm | 304 PS |
| Max Torque | 518 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 608 Nm |
| Transmission | 10-speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Large Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | SUV | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Black, Summit White | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5352 | 5060 |
| Width (mm) | 2057 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1928 | 1790 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3071 | 3130 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2568 | 2505 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 106 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 21 |
| Front Tires | 285/50/R20 | 285/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 285/50/R20 | 285/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Three-zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 14 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3L Z71 4×4 A/T (2022) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range offers significantly better value at ₱4,580,000—over ₱3 million cheaper than the Chevrolet Tahoe Z71 (₱7,703,000). The IONIQ 9 also provides higher torque (608 Nm vs. 518 Nm) and a longer warranty (5 years/200,000 km vs. 5 years/100,000 km), making it more suitable for daily commuting with lower running costs as an electric vehicle. Its unibody construction delivers a smoother, more refined ride on paved roads. However, the Tahoe excels in outright power (355 PS vs. 304 PS) and off-road capability with its body-on-frame chassis and 4WD system, ideal for towing or rough terrain. The Tahoe seats up to 8 passengers (2+3+3 layout), while the IONIQ 9 seats 7 (2+2+3), though both are large crossovers. Ultimately, choose the IONIQ 9 for modern tech, efficiency, and cost savings, or the Tahoe for traditional SUV toughness and maximum passenger capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is significantly cheaper at ₱4,580,000 compared to the Chevrolet Tahoe at ₱7,703,000.
Which has more power?
The Chevrolet Tahoe has a higher max power of 355 PS, while the Hyundai IONIQ 9 has 304 PS. However, the IONIQ 9 produces more torque (608 Nm vs. 518 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is better for daily commuting due to its electric motor (lower fuel costs) and longer warranty (5 years/200,000 km), plus a smoother unibody ride.
Which has better off-road capability?
The Chevrolet Tahoe is better off-road with its body-on-frame construction, 4WD drivetrain, and higher ground clearance typical of a traditional SUV. The IONIQ 9 is an AWD crossover optimized for on-road use.