Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 | Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) Mazda ₱2,990,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Diesel |
| Max Power | 394 PS | 254 PS @ 3750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 676 Nm | 550 Nm @ 1500 - 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Displacement | — | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15.2:1 |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | SUV | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow | Rhodium White Premium, Soul Red Crystal |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4713 | 4745 |
| Width (mm) | 1881 | 1890 |
| Height (mm) | 1627 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2984 | 2870 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2084 | 1897 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 58 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers weighing value against performance, the Mazda CX‑60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo‑D Sport offers a more affordable entry point at ₱2,990,000 compared to the Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD’s ₱3,499,000. The CX‑60 delivers 254 PS and 550 Nm of torque from a turbocharged diesel inline‑4, which is sufficient for everyday driving and offers better fuel economy than the Mustang’s all‑electric powertrain that peaks at 394 PS and 676 Nm. The Mustang’s electric motor, however, provides instant torque and a cleaner driving experience with zero tailpipe emissions, appealing to buyers prioritizing sustainability. In terms of practicality, both vehicles share a midsize crossover body and 5‑door layout, but the Mustang’s electric drivetrain may require access to charging infrastructure. Ultimately, if cost and diesel performance are key, choose the CX‑60; if zero‑emission driving and higher peak power are priorities and budget allows, the Mustang Mach‑E is preferable.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑60 costs ₱2,990,000 while the Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD is priced at ₱3,499,000.
Which has more power?
The Mustang Mach‑E’s electric motor produces 394 PS and 676 Nm, whereas the CX‑60 delivers 254 PS and 550 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Both are midsize crossovers with 5 doors, but the Mustang offers instant electric torque and zero emissions, while the CX‑60 provides a diesel engine with lower fuel costs.
Which has a longer warranty?
Both vehicles offer the same 3‑year/100,000 km warranty.