Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 | Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024) Nissan ₱3,988,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 394 PS | 383 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 676 Nm | 475 Nm @ 1600 - 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Displacement | — | 2997cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Premium Sports |
| Segment | SUV | Coupe |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow | Boulder Grey Pearl / Black Roof, Everest White / Black Roof, Seiran Blue / Black Roof, Passion Red / Black Roof, Ikazuchi Yellow / Black Roof, Black Diamond Pear |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4713 | 4380 |
| Width (mm) | 1881 | 1845 |
| Height (mm) | 1627 | 1315 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2984 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2084 | 1600 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 62 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/55R19 | 255/40/R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55R19 | 275/35/R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather-Suede |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT (2024): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers looking for a versatile, electric crossover with modern amenities and all‑wheel drive, the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD is the clear choice. Priced at ₱3,499,000 it is cheaper than the gasoline‑powered Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT, which costs ₱3,988,000. The Mach‑E delivers a higher maximum power of 394 PS compared to the Z’s 383 PS, and its torque (676 Nm) far exceeds the Z’s 475 Nm, giving it stronger acceleration and better torque‑heavy performance. Both vehicles share a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty and unibody construction, but the Mach‑E’s electric motor eliminates fuel costs and maintenance associated with a turbocharged inline‑4. In terms of practicality, the Mach‑E’s midsize crossover body offers 5 doors and a seating capacity of 2 + 3, ideal for families or daily commutes, whereas the Z’s coupe body has only 2 doors and seats just two. The Mach‑E also benefits from a larger overall length (4713 mm) and width (1881 mm), providing more interior space. For those prioritizing power, torque, lower operating costs, and family‑friendly practicality, the Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD is the superior option. If a buyer values a sporty coupe aesthetic and higher horsepower in a gasoline engine, the Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT remains an attractive alternative but at a higher price and with less practicality.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD costs ₱3,499,000, while the Nissan Z 3.0 Premium MT is priced at ₱3,988,000.
Which has more power?
The Mach‑E’s electric motor produces 394 PS, slightly higher than the Z’s 383 PS from its turbocharged inline‑4.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mach‑E offers a crossover body with 5 doors, 2 + 3 seating, and electric drive, making it more practical for daily use than the two‑door coupe of the Z.
What are the torque differences?
The Mach‑E delivers 676 Nm of torque, far surpassing the Z’s 475 Nm, providing stronger performance especially at low speeds.