Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,820,000 | GAC Aion V Premium (2026) GAC ₱1,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2023 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 5-years/150,000km | 8-year / 160,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1996cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm | 224 PS |
| Max Torque | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver | Sahara Sand, Onyx Black, Alpine White, Volcano Orange, Aurora Silver, Iceland Grey, Volcano Orange with White Roof |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5370 | 4605 |
| Width (mm) | 1918 | 1854 |
| Height (mm) | 1884 | 1686 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3270 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1953 | 2330 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 255/70/R16 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70/R16 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2023 Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T and the 2026 GAC Aion V Premium, the choice hinges on usage and budget. The Ranger costs ₱1,820,000, is a diesel‑powered, body‑on‑frame pickup with 170 PS and a robust 405 Nm torque band, making it ideal for hauling, off‑road work, or a small business that needs payload capacity and a rugged drivetrain (RWD). Its 5‑year/150,000 km warranty and 4‑door cabin with 2+3 seating suit a utility‑focused lifestyle, though fuel costs and emissions are higher. The Aion V, priced slightly lower at ₱1,698,000, is an electric midsize crossover SUV with 224 PS, 240 Nm torque, and front‑wheel drive, offering smoother city driving, zero tailpipe emissions, and lower running costs. Its 8‑year/160,000 km warranty and unibody construction provide a more car‑like ride, plus five doors and comparable seating for families. However, it lacks the payload and off‑road capability of the Ranger. If you need a workhorse for cargo, rural roads, or towing, the Ranger is the better fit despite the higher price and diesel fuel. If you prioritize fuel‑economy, lower emissions, and a comfortable family SUV for urban use, the Aion V is the smarter pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The GAC Aion V Premium is priced at ₱1,698,000, which is ₱122,000 less than the Ford Ranger’s ₱1,820,000 price tag.
Which model offers more power?
The Aion V provides 224 PS, while the Ranger delivers 170 PS, making the electric SUV more powerful on paper.
Which is more suitable for hauling or off‑road work?
The Ford Ranger, with its body‑on‑frame construction, 405 Nm torque and RWD layout, is designed for payload and off‑road capability, unlike the Aion V.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty?
The Aion V comes with an 8‑year/160,000 km warranty, compared to the Ranger’s 5‑year/150,000 km warranty.