Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLS 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Elite (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLS 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Elite (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLS 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,379,000 | GAC Aion V Elite (2026) GAC ₱1,498,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2023 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 5-years/150,000km | 8-year / 160,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1996cc | — |
| Valvetrain | 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 168 PS | 183 PS |
| Max Torque | 405 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 2WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver | Sahara Sand, Onyx Black, Alpine White, Volcano Orange, Aurora Silver, Iceland Grey, Volcano Orange with White Roof |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5370 | 4605 |
| Width (mm) | 1918 | 1854 |
| Height (mm) | 1884 | 1686 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3270 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2053 | 1950 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring Non-Independent | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 255/70R16 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70R16 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Mechanical | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLS 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Elite (2026): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing raw power and traditional utility, the Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLS 4x2 A/T is the superior choice. At ₱1,379,000, it offers a diesel engine producing 168 PS and 405 Nm of torque, ideal for heavy loads or off-road use with its body-on-frame construction and 2WD drivetrain. Conversely, the GAC Aion V Elite is best for those seeking a modern, fuel-efficient electric lifestyle. Priced higher at ₱1,498,000, it delivers 183 PS of power via an electric motor, features a unibody chassis, and offers five doors for easier access. The Ranger wins on price and torque, while the Aion V Elite wins on warranty (8-year/160k km vs 5-year/150k km), drivetrain versatility (FWD vs 2WD), and electric operation.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLS 4x2 A/T is cheaper, priced at ₱1,379,000 compared to the GAC Aion V Elite's ₱1,498,000.
Which has more power?
The GAC Aion V Elite is slightly more powerful with 183 PS versus the Ford Ranger's 168 PS, though the Ranger generates significantly more torque at 405 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The GAC Aion V Elite is better for daily commuting due to its electric powertrain, FWD drivetrain, and 5-door configuration for easier entry/exit.
How do their warranties compare?
The GAC Aion V Elite offers a longer warranty of 8 years/160,000 km, whereas the Ford Ranger provides 5 years/150,000 km.