Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLT 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLT 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLT 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,694,000 | GAC Aion V Premium (2026) GAC ₱1,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2023 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 5-years/150,000km | 8-year / 160,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1996cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm | 224 PS |
| Max Torque | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver | Sahara Sand, Onyx Black, Alpine White, Volcano Orange, Aurora Silver, Iceland Grey, Volcano Orange with White Roof |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5370 | 4605 |
| Width (mm) | 1918 | 1854 |
| Height (mm) | 1884 | 1686 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3270 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2039 | 2330 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 255/70/R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70/R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo XLT 4×2 A/T (2023) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with good power-to-weight ratio, the Ford Ranger stands out as the better choice. The Ranger offers a more robust build and superior towing capacity, making it ideal for those who need a truck to handle heavy loads or rough terrain. Additionally, its diesel engine provides excellent fuel efficiency and performance, which is crucial in a country where vehicle maintenance can be expensive. For those seeking an electric SUV with advanced features, the GAC Aion V offers a more luxurious driving experience and superior battery life, but it may not offer as much towing capacity or practicality for daily commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The Ford Ranger is typically known for good fuel efficiency in its segment due to its diesel engine. The GAC Aion V uses an electric motor and does not provide specific fuel economy data.
Who should buy the Ford Ranger over the GAC Aion V?
Those who prioritize a robust build, superior towing capacity, and practicality for daily commuting would likely prefer the Ford Ranger. The GAC Aion V is better suited for those seeking an electric SUV with advanced features and luxury.
Which car offers more power and torque?
The GAC Aion V delivers more power and torque compared to the Ford Ranger, with 224 PS and 240 Nm against 170 PS and 405 Nm respectively. However, this advantage is offset by the higher price of the GAC Aion V.
Which car offers better practicality for a family?
The Ford Ranger's four-door design can be more practical for families compared to the five-door GAC Aion V, which may not offer as much space inside. The Ranger also has a longer wheelbase and is available in various exterior colors.