Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) Foton ₱1,298,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 5 years or 150,000 kms | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1968cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 161 PS | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 390 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed Manual | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | White | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5340 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1940 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1870 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3110 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1990 | 1260 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 76 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/70R18 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70R18 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
For those looking for a reliable pickup truck with decent power and towing capacity, the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT is a strong choice. It offers more torque and horsepower than the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT while being significantly cheaper. The Foton's body-on-frame construction also provides better protection in case of accidents.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT costs ₱1,298,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT at ₱1,259,000.
Which has more power?
The Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT has more max torque (390 Nm) and horsepower (161 PS) compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT which has 105 PS and 141 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT, with its 4WD capability, might be better suited for daily commuting due to its towing capacity of up to 3,500 kg (unspecified in the data, but typical for such trucks).
Which is more fuel efficient?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT uses gasoline while the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT runs on diesel, so it's not directly comparable in terms of fuel efficiency. However, diesel engines are generally less fuel-efficient than petrol ones.