Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) Hyundai ₱2,840,000 | Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) Mazda ₱2,990,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Diesel |
| Max Power | 168 PS | 254 PS @ 3750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 550 Nm @ 1500 - 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Displacement | — | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15.2:1 |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Rhodium White Premium, Soul Red Crystal |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 4745 |
| Width (mm) | 1815 | 1890 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 2870 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1855 | 1897 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 58 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Front Tires | 235/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality between the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) and the Mazda CX‑60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo‑D Sport (2023), the IONIQ 5 offers a clearer value proposition. Priced at ₱2,840,000 versus the CX‑60’s ₱2,990,000, it is cheaper by ₱150,000. Both are midsize crossover SUVs with unibody construction and five doors, but the IONIQ 5’s electric motor delivers 168 PS and 350 Nm, while the CX‑60’s turbocharged diesel engine produces a higher 254 PS and 550 Nm. The IONIQ 5’s 5‑year/200,000 km warranty outlasts the CX‑60’s 3‑year/100,000 km guarantee. In terms of drivetrain, the IONIQ 5 is RWD whereas the CX‑60 is AWD; if all‑weather traction is a priority, the Mazda’s AWD may appeal. However, for daily commuting and lower operating costs, the IONIQ 5’s electric powertrain offers zero fuel expenses and a smoother ride. The IONIQ 5 also boasts a broader palette of exterior colors, including Digital Teal and Shooting Star Matte Gray, giving buyers more styling options. Overall, the IONIQ 5 is recommended for those prioritizing affordability, lower running costs, and a longer warranty, while the CX‑60 suits buyers who value higher power output and AWD capability.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range costs ₱2,840,000, while the Mazda CX‑60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo‑D Sport costs ₱2,990,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda CX‑60’s turbocharged diesel engine delivers 254 PS and 550 Nm, compared to the IONIQ 5’s electric motor with 168 PS and 350 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 5’s electric powertrain offers zero fuel costs and a smoother ride, making it more economical for daily commuting.
Which offers a longer warranty?
The IONIQ 5 provides a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty, whereas the CX‑60 offers a 3‑year/100,000 km guarantee.