Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Tan Nappa Leather (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Tan Nappa Leather (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) Hyundai ₱2,840,000 | Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Tan Nappa Leather (2024) Mazda ₱2,630,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 5 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 168 PS | 184 PS |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Displacement | — | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Naturally Aspirated |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Sports Coupe |
| Segment | Crossover | Roadster |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Jet Black, Soul Red, Snowflake White Pearl, Machine Grey, Eternal Blue |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 3915 |
| Width (mm) | 1815 | 1735 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1235 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 2310 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1855 | 1138 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 235/55R19 | 205/45R17 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55R19 | 205/45R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda MX-5 RF 2.0-L AT Tan Nappa Leather (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, practicality, and daily usability, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range emerges as the more balanced choice. At ₱2,840,000 it is only slightly pricier than the Mazda MX‑5 RF but offers a larger body type (midsize crossover SUV) with 2+3 seating, making it better suited for families or those needing extra cargo space. The IONIQ 5’s electric powertrain delivers 168 PS and a torque of 350 Nm, which is ample for urban driving and offers the benefit of zero fuel costs. Its 5‑door configuration, RWD drivetrain, and unibody construction provide a comfortable ride for everyday use. Conversely, the Mazda MX‑5 RF is a 2‑seat sports coupe priced at ₱2,630,000, with higher power (184 PS) but lower torque (205 Nm). It is ideal for driving enthusiasts who prioritize a lightweight, rear‑wheel‑driven sports experience and do not require extra seating or cargo capacity. In summary, choose the Hyundai IONIQ 5 if you need practicality and future‑proofing with an electric vehicle, or the Mazda MX‑5 RF if you seek spirited driving in a pure sports coupe.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda MX‑5 RF costs ₱2,630,000, while the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range is ₱2,840,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda MX‑5 RF delivers 184 PS, slightly higher than the Hyundai IONIQ 5’s 168 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5, being an electric crossover with 2+3 seating and a larger cargo area, is more suited for daily commuting and family use.
Which offers better torque?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 provides 350 Nm of torque, significantly higher than the Mazda MX‑5 RF’s 205 Nm.