Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 | Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024) Nissan ₱3,988,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 229 PS | 383 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 475 Nm @ 1600 - 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 9-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Displacement | — | 2997cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Premium Sports |
| Segment | Crossover | Coupe |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Boulder Grey Pearl / Black Roof, Everest White / Black Roof, Seiran Blue / Black Roof, Passion Red / Black Roof, Ikazuchi Yellow / Black Roof, Black Diamond Pear |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 4380 |
| Width (mm) | 1800 | 1845 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1315 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2005 | 1647 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 62 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 255/45R20 | 255/40/R19 |
| Rear Tires | 255/45R20 | 275/35/R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather-Suede |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Key |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range and the Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT boils down to lifestyle and priorities. The IONIQ 5 is a practical, family-friendly electric crossover SUV priced at ₱3,698,000. It seats five, offers a spacious interior, and has a 5-year/200,000 km warranty, making it ideal for daily commuting, cargo hauling, and lower running costs (electric). In contrast, the Nissan Z is a pure sports coupe at ₱3,998,000, with a potent 383 PS turbocharged gasoline engine, rear-wheel drive, and a 9-speed automatic. It seats only two, has a shorter 3-year/100,000 km warranty, and prioritizes performance over practicality. If you need a versatile, efficient, and comfortable daily driver with modern tech and low operating costs, choose the IONIQ 5. If you value thrilling acceleration, track-day fun, and iconic sports car heritage, and can accept minimal passenger/cargo space, the Nissan Z is the clear choice. The ₱290,000 price difference is offset by the Z's significantly higher power (383 vs 229 PS) and torque (475 vs 350 Nm), but the IONIQ 5 offers far greater utility and lower cost per kilometer.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range is cheaper at ₱3,698,000, while the Nissan Z 3.0 Premium AT costs ₱3,988,000, a difference of ₱290,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Nissan Z is more powerful with 383 PS and 475 Nm (turbocharged gasoline), compared to the IONIQ 5's 229 PS and 350 Nm (electric motor).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 5 is better for daily commuting due to its electric powertrain (lower running costs), 5-seat capacity, and crossover SUV practicality, unlike the Nissan Z, which is a 2-seat sports coupe with limited cargo space.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 offers a longer warranty at 5 years or 200,000 km, versus the Nissan Z's 3 years or 100,000 km.