Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,068,000 | Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023) Mazda ₱2,890,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 168 PS | 284 PS @ 5000 - 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 450 Nm @ 2000 - 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Displacement | — | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | — | 12:1 |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Rhodium White Premium, Soul Red Crystal |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 4745 |
| Width (mm) | 1890 | 1890 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 2870 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1880 | 1897 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 58 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Front Tires | 235/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2023): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer deciding between the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (₱3,068,000) and the Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (₱2,890,000), the choice hinges on priorities. The CX-60 is cheaper by ₱178,000 and offers significantly more power (284 PS vs 168 PS) and torque (450 Nm vs 350 Nm) from its turbocharged 3.3L gasoline engine, plus AWD for better traction in wet or rough roads. Its 3-year/100,000km warranty is shorter. The IONIQ 5, while pricier and less powerful, is an electric vehicle with instant torque, a longer 5-year/200,000km warranty, and lower running costs if charging is accessible. It's RWD and slightly larger (length 4655mm vs CX-60 not given). For buyers who value performance, AWD, and a lower purchase price, the Mazda CX-60 is the better choice. For those prioritizing low operating costs, a longer warranty, and zero emissions—and who have home or public charging—the IONIQ 5 is compelling. Ultimately, the CX-60 suits traditionalists needing power and all-weather capability; the IONIQ 5 appeals to eco-conscious commuters with charging access.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo is cheaper at ₱2,890,000 compared to the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range at ₱3,068,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Mazda CX-60 is more powerful with 284 PS and 450 Nm of torque, versus the Hyundai IONIQ 5’s 168 PS and 350 Nm.
Which vehicle has a better warranty?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 offers a longer warranty: 5 years or 200,000 km, compared to the Mazda CX-60’s 3 years or 100,000 km.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
For daily commuting, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 is better if you have access to charging, as it offers lower running costs and a longer warranty. The Mazda CX-60 is better if you need AWD and more power for longer or mixed routes.