Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 304 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 608 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Displacement | — | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Large Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5060 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1790 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3130 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2505 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 21 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 21 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 285/45R21 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 285/45R21 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 14 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing value, performance and practicality, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range stands out as the more compelling choice. Priced at ₱4,580,000 versus the Land Cruiser Prado’s ₱4,806,000, it offers a lower entry cost while delivering 304 PS and an impressive 608 Nm torque from its electric motor—double the Prado’s peak power of 281 PS and a higher torque range. The IONIQ 9 also boasts an all‑electric drivetrain, eliminating fuel costs and aligning with the Philippines’ growing EV infrastructure. Its 5‑door, 2+2+3 seating layout and longer length (5060 mm) provide ample space for families, while the AWD system ensures competent handling on varied road conditions. The Prado’s body‑on‑frame construction and 4WD are rugged, but its gasoline engine (2393 cc turbo) and higher warranty limits (3‑years/100,000 km) make it less economical over time. If a buyer prioritizes long‑term operating savings, lower maintenance, and modern electric performance, the IONIQ 9 is the clear winner. Those who need proven off‑road capability and a gasoline powertrain may still prefer the Prado, but for most daily commuters and families in Metro Manila or similar urban settings, the IONIQ 9 offers better value and future‑proofing.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range costs ₱4,580,000, while the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is ₱4,806,000.
Which has more power?
The IONIQ 9 delivers 304 PS and 608 Nm torque, whereas the Prado provides 281 PS at 6000 rpm and 430 Nm torque between 1700–3600 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 9’s electric motor offers lower running costs, zero emissions and a spacious 2+2+3 seating layout, making it more suited for daily commuting than the Prado’s gasoline engine.
What are the warranty differences?
The IONIQ 9 comes with a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty; the Prado offers a shorter 3‑year/100,000 km guarantee.