Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e (2024) Land Rover ₱10,490,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3 year/Unlimited | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1997cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | PHEV | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 398 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 640 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 8-Speed | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Large Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | "Fuji White Solid, Pangea Green Metallic, Gondwana Stone Metallic, Santorini Black Metallic, Tasman Blue Metallic, Sedona Red Metallic, Carpathian Grey Premium Metallic, Faroe Green Premium Metallic" | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 7 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4758 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 2008 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1972 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3022 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2525 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 90 | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Muti-link with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 235/65R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/65R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For those looking for a high-performance crossover SUV with advanced hybrid technology and spacious interior, the Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e is the better choice. It offers superior power and torque, along with an extensive color palette and AWD capability. The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado, while more affordable, lacks these features and has a less advanced drivetrain.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2025 is cheaper at ₱4,806,000 compared to the Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e at ₱10,490,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e has more power with a max of 398 PS compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado's 281 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e offers an AWD system which can be beneficial for off-road conditions and bad weather, making it a better choice for daily commuting compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado's 4WD.
Which vehicle has more exterior colors?
The Land Rover Defender 110 X-Dynamic SE P400e offers more exterior color options with 8 different choices, while the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado has only 3 available colors.