Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art (2024) Mercedes-Benz ₱4,290,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 190 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Displacement | — | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Premium Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Polar white, Night black, High tech silver, Spectral blue, Mountain grey, Cosmos black metallic, | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 7 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4684 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1834 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1689 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2829 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2105 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 235/50R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/50R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing urban efficiency and lower operating costs, the Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art is the superior choice, especially if you frequently navigate congested Metro Manila streets where a 190 PS electric powertrain offers quiet, instant acceleration with zero fuel expenses. However, if your primary need is rugged capability for off-roading or heavy towing in remote areas, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is the definitive selection. The Prado's 281 PS turbocharged 2.4-liter engine paired with a body-on-frame construction and 4WD system provides the durability and torque (430 Nm) required for rough Philippine terrain, whereas the EQB's unibody electric design is optimized for comfort and city driving. Ultimately, choose the EQB for daily commuting and lower running costs at ₱4,290,000, or the Prado for versatility and power at ₱4,806,000.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art is cheaper, priced at ₱4,290,000 compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT at ₱4,806,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT has more power with 281 PS, exceeding the Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art's 190 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Mercedes-Benz EQB 250 Electric Art is better for daily commuting due to its electric motor, 5-door configuration, and lower price, making it ideal for urban environments.
Which vehicle is more powerful for off-road use?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is more powerful for off-road use because it features a 4WD drivetrain and a body-on-frame construction, unlike the EQB's FWD unibody design.