Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line (2024) Mercedes-Benz ₱7,190,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 292 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 565 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | Single Speed | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Displacement | — | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Premium Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Sodalite Blue Metallic, Polar White, High Tech Silver Metallic, Black, Black Metallic, Selenite Grey, Emerald Green, Velvet Brown, Alpine Grey Solid, Oplaite White Bright | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4863 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1940 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3030 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2455 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 21 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 21 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 245/45R21 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 245/45R21 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 15 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing value, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is the clear choice, offering a lower entry price of ₱4,806,000 compared to the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line's ₱7,190,000. While the Mercedes offers more premium exterior color options and a 292 PS electric motor with 565 Nm torque, the Toyota provides superior off-road capability through its 4WD system and body-on-frame construction versus the Mercedes' RWD unibody chassis. If budget is the primary constraint, the Toyota wins on price and drivetrain versatility. However, if the buyer prioritizes a sleek, modern electric driving experience with a wider variety of exterior paint choices, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line is the superior luxury option, despite its higher cost and lack of all-wheel drive.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is cheaper at ₱4,806,000 compared to the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line which costs ₱7,190,000.
Which car has more power?
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line has more power with 292 PS versus the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT which produces 281 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting in Manila?
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line is designed for daily commuting with its electric motor, while the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT offers 4WD for varied road conditions.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT offers a longer warranty of 3-years/100,000km compared to the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 + AMG Line which comes with a 2-year warranty.