Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic SUV AMG Line (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic SUV AMG Line (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic SUV AMG Line (2024) Mercedes-Benz ₱9,990,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 360 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 800 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Displacement | — | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Premium Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Selenite Grey, Polar White, Silver Metallic, Obsidian Black Metallic, Sodalite Blue Metallic, Velvet Brown, Emerald Green | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5136 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 2157 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1718 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3210 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2860 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Multi-link with Airmatic | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Airmatic | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 21 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 21 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 255/45R21 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 255/45R21 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 15 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic SUV AMG Line (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an electric SUV with advanced features and performance, the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic is the better choice. It offers superior power output at 360 PS and has AWD capability, making it ideal for those who need robust all-weather driving conditions. The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado, while offering a strong engine with good torque, falls short in terms of electric technology and practicality compared to the Mercedes-Benz model.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic has significantly more power at 360 PS compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado's 281 PS.
Which vehicle offers better fuel efficiency?
Both vehicles use electric and gasoline respectively, so they don't offer direct comparisons in terms of fuel efficiency. However, since the Mercedes-Benz model is electric, it may have lower emissions and a more efficient driving experience over time.
Which SUV is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado with its 4WD system might be slightly better suited for daily commuting due to its robust construction and all-wheel drive. However, the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV's electric powertrain could offer smoother, more efficient driving in urban conditions.
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado at ₱4,806,000 is significantly cheaper than the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4Matic at ₱9,990,000. However, consider long-term maintenance and operational costs when making your decision.