MG Cyberster EV (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of MG Cyberster EV (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | MG Cyberster EV (2026) MG ₱4,500,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 5-years/100,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 543 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 725 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | Single Speed | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Displacement | — | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Convertible Roadster | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Convertible/Roadster | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Flare Red, Irises Cyan, Nuclear Yellow, Modern Beige, Andes Grey, Light Speed Silver | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4535 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1913 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1329 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2690 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1985 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 245/40R20 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 275/35R20 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Electric Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt&Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Cnetral Locking | Central Locking |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | — | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | — | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | — | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | — | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Seat Material | Nappa Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless | Keyless Entry |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Rear A/C Vents | — | No |
| Push-Button Start | — | No |
| Cruise Control | — | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | — | No |
| Eco Mode | — | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| Navigation | — | Yes |
| CD Player | — | No |
| DVD Player | — | No |
| MP3 Playback | — | No |
| SD Card Slot | — | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Fog Lights | — | Yes |
MG Cyberster EV (2026) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing style, speed, and a two-seater experience, the MG Cyberster EV is the clear choice. It offers significantly more power at 543 PS compared to the Prado's 281 PS and comes with a longer 5-year warranty versus the Prado's 3-year coverage. However, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is the only viable option for families or those needing three rows of seating. While the Cyberster is cheaper by ₱306,000, the Prado provides practical utility with 5 doors and a 2+3+2 seating layout, whereas the Cyberster is strictly a 2-door roadster. The decision ultimately rests on whether the buyer values electric performance and aesthetics or needs a robust, gas-powered SUV with space for passengers.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The MG Cyberster EV is cheaper at ₱4,500,000, which is ₱306,000 less than the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT priced at ₱4,806,000.
Which car has more power?
The MG Cyberster EV is significantly more powerful with a max output of 543 PS, compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT which produces 281 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting or family use?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is better for family use as it offers a 2+3+2 seating capacity and 5 doors, while the MG Cyberster EV is strictly a 2-door roadster with only 2 seats.
Which car has a longer warranty?
The MG Cyberster EV offers a longer warranty of 5-years/100,000km, whereas the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT comes with a 3-years/100,000km warranty.