Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018) Nissan ₱1,280,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1459cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 105 PS | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-Speed | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Van |
| Segment | MPV | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1750 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1260 | 2076 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 205/55R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/55R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing family comfort against cargo utility, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) is the better all‑round choice if daily passenger transport, modern styling and an automatic gearbox are priorities. Priced at ₱1,259,000, it is slightly cheaper than the Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo (₱1,280,000) while offering a 5‑door MPV layout, 7‑seat configuration (2+3+2) and a smooth 4‑speed automatic transmission, which is more convenient for city driving. Its 1.5‑L naturally aspirated gasoline engine delivers 105 PS and 141 Nm, sufficient for typical family trips and urban traffic. In contrast, the NV350 is a 2018‑model van built on a body‑on‑frame chassis, designed for cargo with only three doors and no passenger seats listed. It packs a larger 2.5‑L turbo‑diesel engine with 129 PS and a robust 356 Nm torque, making it far stronger for heavy loads but less suited for regular commuting. The van’s 5‑speed manual transmission and rear‑wheel drive add to its work‑truck character. Therefore, choose the Xpander for comfort, automatic ease, and modern MPV practicality; opt for the NV350 only if you need high torque for hauling goods and can manage a manual, utilitarian setup.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT is priced at ₱1,259,000, which is ₱21,000 less than the Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo at ₱1,280,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan 2.5 Cargo produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, surpassing the Xpander’s 105 PS and 141 Nm.
Is there an automatic transmission option?
Yes, the Xpander GLS AT comes with a 4‑speed automatic, while the NV350 is equipped with a 5‑speed manual transmission.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily family commuting?
The Xpander, with its 7‑seat layout, 5 doors, automatic gearbox and MPV body style, is better suited for everyday family use compared to the cargo‑oriented, three‑door van.