Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 | Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) Suzuki ₱1,059,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1499cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 105 PS | 104 PS |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Transmission | Manual 5-Speed | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | MPV | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof | Silky Silver Metallic, Celestial Blue Pearl Metallic, Arctic White, Bluish Black, Granite Gray Metallic |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 3995 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1750 | 1550 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 2520 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1260 | 1010 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 37 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/55R17 | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/55R17 | 195/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Mechanical | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT and Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT hinges on your priorities. If you need seating for up to seven passengers and maximum cargo flexibility, the Xpander is the clear pick—its 2+3+2 layout is ideal for larger families or group trips. However, it comes with a manual transmission, which may be less convenient in heavy traffic, and a higher price tag of ₱1,099,000. On the other hand, the Suzuki Fronx, at ₱1,059,000, is more affordable and features a 4-speed automatic transmission that is easier for daily commuting. It seats five, making it a practical choice for smaller families or urban dwellers who prioritize ease of driving. Both vehicles are similarly powered (105 PS vs 104 PS) and naturally aspirated, but the Fronx is a crossover with a lower displacement (1462cc vs 1499cc), likely offering better fuel economy. Warranty terms are identical. Ultimately, the Xpander is the better value for space and seating capacity, while the Fronx wins on price, automatic convenience, and likely fuel efficiency for city use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT is cheaper at ₱1,059,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT at ₱1,099,000.
Which has more power?
The Mitsubishi Xpander has slightly more power with 105 PS and 141 Nm of torque, versus the Suzuki Fronx's 104 PS and 138 Nm.
Which is better for large families?
The Mitsubishi Xpander is better for large families as it seats 7 passengers in a 2+3+2 configuration, while the Suzuki Fronx seats only 5.
Which is better for daily commuting in traffic?
The Suzuki Fronx is better for daily commuting because it has a 4-speed automatic transmission, whereas the Mitsubishi Xpander has a manual 5-speed, which can be tiring in heavy traffic.