Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025) Toyota ₱1,041,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1499cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 105 PS | 150 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm | 343 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | Manual 5-Speed | Manual |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Van |
| Segment | MPV | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 5300 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1750 | 2180 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 3085 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1260 | 1775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 205/55R17 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 205/55R17 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Mechanical | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing daily comfort, family space, and fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is the superior choice. At ₱1,099,000, it offers a practical 2+3+2 seating configuration with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine, making it ideal for family transport. Conversely, the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T is strictly for commercial or utility use. Priced lower at ₱1,041,000, it lacks passenger seating entirely, features a turbocharged 2.4L diesel engine for raw torque, and utilizes a body-on-frame chassis. Choose the Xpander for living and the Tamaraw for work or hauling.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more affordable?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T is cheaper, priced at ₱1,041,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT at ₱1,099,000.
Which engine produces more power?
The Toyota Tamaraw is significantly more powerful with 150 PS from its turbocharged 2.4L engine, whereas the Mitsubishi Xpander produces only 105 PS from its 1.5L naturally aspirated engine.
Which vehicle is better for carrying passengers?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is designed for passengers with a 2+3+2 seating capacity, while the Toyota Tamaraw has only 2 doors and a seating capacity of 2, offering no passenger space.
What is the difference in drivetrain and chassis construction?
The Mitsubishi Xpander uses a unibody construction with a front-wheel drive (FWD) layout, while the Toyota Tamaraw features a body-on-frame construction with a rear-wheel drive (RWD) layout.