Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025) Toyota ₱1,142,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1499cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Max Power | 105 PS | 150 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm | 343 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | Manual 5-Speed | Manual |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Van |
| Segment | MPV | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+12 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 5303 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1750 | 2097 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 3085 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1260 | 1905 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 205/55R17 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 205/55R17 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Mechanical | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T (2025): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers looking for a fuel-efficient and versatile MPV with decent power, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is recommended. It offers better fuel efficiency due to its naturally aspirated engine, manual transmission, and lower price point compared to the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T. The Xpander also has a longer warranty period of 3 years/100,000 km.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T outperforms the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT with higher power outputs at 150 PS compared to 105 PS.
Is the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT better for daily commuting?
Yes, it is more suitable for daily use due to its lower price of ₱1,099,000 and manual transmission which can be easier to handle in traffic compared to the Tamaraw's diesel engine.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT comes with a 3-year/100,000 km warranty, while the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T offers a similar warranty of 3 years or 100,000 kilometers.
Which vehicle has more doors?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT has 5 doors compared to the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Utility Van LWB DSL M/T which only has 3 doors.