Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024) Toyota ₱4,691,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2487cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 250 PS @ 6000 rpm (Combined) | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 270 Nm @ 4300 - 4500 rpm (Combined) | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV AUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | MPV | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | Platinum White Pearl | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5010 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1950 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2310 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Front Tires | — | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | — | 265/60/R20 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Four Zone Auto Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 15 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT – Precious Metal (2024) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and everyday practicality, the Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT comes out ahead when the priority is a spacious, comfortable MPV with lower running costs and hybrid efficiency. Priced at ₱4,691,000 versus the Land Cruiser Prado’s ₱4,806,000, it is slightly cheaper and offers a 250 PS combined output with 270 Nm torque from its 2.5‑L hybrid powertrain, delivering smooth city performance and better fuel economy. The Alphard’s 5‑door unibody construction, 2+2+3 seating and CVT transmission make it ideal for families needing ample rear space, while the FWD layout keeps maintenance simpler. Conversely, the Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is a more rugged SUV with a higher 281 PS output and 430 Nm torque from its turbocharged engine, plus a robust 4WD body‑on‑frame chassis that excels in off‑road or uneven terrain. Its 5‑door SUV body and 2+3+2 seating cater to those who need a larger cargo area or more off‑road capability. In summary, choose the Alphard for daily commuting and family comfort with a lower price tag; opt for the Prado if off‑road performance, higher torque and a more powerful engine are your top priorities.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Alphard 2.5 HEV CVT costs ₱4,691,000, while the Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT costs ₱4,806,000, making the Alphard slightly cheaper.
Which model has more power?
The Land Cruiser Prado’s 2.4 Turbo engine delivers 281 PS, slightly higher than the Alphard’s combined 250 PS from its hybrid powertrain.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Alphard’s hybrid powertrain, CVT transmission and FWD layout provide smoother city driving and better fuel efficiency, making it more suitable for daily commuting.
Which car offers better off‑road capability?
The Land Cruiser Prado’s 4WD drivetrain, higher torque of 430 Nm and body‑on‑frame construction give it superior off‑road performance compared to the Alphard.