Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) vs Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) vs Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 | Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor (2024) Volvo ₱4,390,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2025 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2393cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Max Power | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm | 408 PS |
| Max Torque | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm | 660 Nm |
| Transmission | 8-A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Large Crossover SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | SUV | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze | Cloud Blue, Crystal White Onyx Black, Fusion Red, Sage Green, Fjord Blue, Silver Dawn, Thunder Grey |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4925 | 4440 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1883 |
| Height (mm) | 1935 | 1647 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2702 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2400 | 2138 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 110 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 265/60/R20 | 235/50R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60/R20 | 235/50R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 13 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) vs Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a robust and versatile SUV with strong power output, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is the better choice. It offers more powerful performance, a longer warranty, and a more durable construction suitable for demanding conditions.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT and Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT costs ₱4,806,000 while the Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor costs ₱4,390,000. The Volvo is cheaper by ₱416,000.
Which vehicle has more power output?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT produces a maximum of 281 PS at 6000 rpm, while the Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor outputs a maximum of 408 PS from its electric motors.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT offers more power and durability suitable for tough conditions, making it better suited for daily commuting compared to the Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor which is designed with an urban focus.
What type of fuel do these vehicles use?
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT uses gasoline while Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Motor runs on electric power.