Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱889,000 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 125 PS @ 3700 rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Segment | Pickup | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloy | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloy | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Polyurethane | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing daily commuter reliability and lower maintenance costs, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer EX is the logical choice over the 2013 Ford Ranger. The Lancer EX is also 39,000 pesos cheaper, and its naturally aspirated 1.6L engine offers smoother operation for city traffic compared to the Ford's turbocharged diesel. However, the Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4x2 MT is the superior pick for those needing a work vehicle, offering a larger 2198cc displacement, higher torque (330 Nm vs 154 Nm), and a robust body-on-frame construction. If the buyer values a modern sedan design with a 3-year warranty and is willing to pay a premium for a gas engine, the Lancer EX wins. Conversely, the Ford Ranger's discontinued status and higher price tag make it less attractive unless specifically required for heavy-duty utility tasks where its 5-speed manual transmission and diesel powertrain provide necessary pulling strength.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2013 Ford Ranger 2.2 Base 4x2 MT is cheaper at ₱889,000 compared to the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT which costs ₱928,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger has more power with 125 PS @ 3700 rpm and significantly more torque at 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm, whereas the Mitsubishi Lancer EX produces 117 PS @ 6000 rpm and 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting in Manila traffic?
The naturally aspirated 1.6L gas engine in the Mitsubishi Lancer EX is generally better for daily commuting as it is lighter, cheaper, and easier to maintain than the heavier, more expensive turbocharged diesel Ford Ranger.
Which vehicle is more practical for work or hauling?
The Ford Ranger is more practical for work due to its pickup body type, body-on-frame construction, and higher torque output, while the Mitsubishi Lancer EX is a C-segment sedan with unibody construction designed for passenger transport.