Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,039,000 | Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,010,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2477cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 8valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 75 PS @ 4200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 21.1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4420 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1650 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1830 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2620 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1535 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloy | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloy | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R16 | 185/80 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R16 | 185/80 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | no |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-2 |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) at ₱1,039,000 and the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (2015) at ₱1,010,000, the choice depends on your priorities. The Ranger offers significantly more power (150 PS vs 75 PS) and torque (330 Nm vs 149 Nm), making it far superior for hauling heavy loads or towing. Its turbocharged diesel engine and 5-speed manual provide strong performance for work or off-road use. However, the Adventure is cheaper by ₱29,000 and seats 7 passengers versus the Ranger's 2+3 capacity, making it better for large families. The Adventure's naturally aspirated engine is simpler and may be easier to maintain, but it lacks power for demanding tasks. Both are discontinued body-on-frame vehicles with 3-year/100,000km warranties. If you need a rugged workhorse with high power, choose the Ranger. If you need an affordable family hauler with more seats, choose the Adventure. For daily commuting, the Adventure's lower power may be adequate for city driving, but the Ranger's torque makes it more versatile.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Adventure is cheaper at ₱1,010,000 compared to the Ford Ranger at ₱1,039,000, a difference of ₱29,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger is significantly more powerful with 150 PS and 330 Nm of torque, versus the Adventure's 75 PS and 149 Nm.
Which is better for a large family?
The Mitsubishi Adventure seats 7 passengers, while the Ford Ranger seats only 2+3, making the Adventure better for larger families.
Which is better for daily commuting?
For daily commuting, the Adventure's lower power may suffice for city driving, but the Ranger's higher torque provides better acceleration and overtaking capability. The Adventure is cheaper and more fuel-efficient due to its smaller engine, but the Ranger offers more versatility.