Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) Audi ₱4,580,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 4200 rpm | 229 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.2 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 220 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 11.8 km/l | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4629 | 4655 |
| Width (mm) | 1898 | 1800 |
| Height (mm) | 1655 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2807 | 3000 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1755 | 2005 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | 5-Link | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Trapezoidal Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 225/45 R20 | 255/45R20 |
| Rear Tires | 225/45 R20 | 255/45R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 8 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi Q5 2.0 TDI Quattro S-tronic DCT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance and practicality, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range emerges as the more sensible choice for most daily users. Priced at ₱3,698,000 it is roughly ₱882,000 cheaper than the 2015 Audi Q5, and it offers a higher peak output of 229 PS versus the Q5’s 177 PS, while still delivering ample torque (350 Nm) for city and highway driving. The IONIQ 5’s electric drivetrain eliminates fuel costs and emissions, a strong advantage in the Philippines where diesel prices are high and urban congestion is common. Its modern unibody midsize crossover SUV body provides a spacious 5‑door layout and flexible 2+3 seating, making it practical for families. The Audi Q5, on the other hand, carries a diesel engine with 380 Nm of torque and all‑wheel drive, which may appeal to buyers needing off‑road capability or who prefer the traditional feel of a diesel SUV, but it costs significantly more, is discontinued, and offers lower fuel economy (11.8 km/l). In summary, choose the Hyundai IONIQ 5 for lower price, higher power, zero‑fuel operation and everyday practicality; opt for the Audi Q5 only if AWD and diesel torque are essential and the higher price is acceptable.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range costs ₱3,698,000, which is about ₱882,000 less than the Audi Q5’s price of ₱4,580,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 produces 229 PS, surpassing the Audi Q5’s 177 PS.
Is the Audi Q5 better for off‑road or all‑weather driving?
Yes, the Audi Q5 comes with all‑wheel drive (AWD), whereas the Hyundai IONIQ 5 is rear‑wheel drive (RWD), making the Q5 more suitable for off‑road or slippery conditions.
Which car is more practical for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5, with its lower price, electric powertrain, higher power output, and 5‑door, 2+3 seating layout, offers greater everyday practicality and lower operating costs compared to the diesel‑powered, discontinued Audi Q5.